Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicodemus David Hufford III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 19:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nicodemus David Hufford III

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this and this article has amazingly stayed the same since starting in June 2006 (shortly before I first started here at Wikipedia). SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Apparently, it's true that he painted Eisenhower: [1]. However, this is about the only thing I can find online about him. A brief mention in a book published by the US Army doesn't really seem like it would be enough to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - at first glance you would think that an artist who had a presidential sitting would have more to his career, but searches did not turn up anything to show notability. Other than some brief mentions, I did get one nice hit over at Books, when I removed the III - this - but even that is a brief bio of the artist who did Eisenhower's portrait. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.