Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickirelan.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted as the user is a sockpuppet of someone I blocked a while ago.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nickirelan.com[edit]
- Nickirelan.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This is a fork from the Dave Winer article. Consensus on that article's talk page was not to include the information there, and I don't think it's worthy of it's own article under web notability guidelines. The article has a whole host of irreperable neutrality and conflict of interest issues. Darksun 17:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This article linked to by the Cybersquatting article. The incident was featured on Valleywag and recived a comment from Dave Winer. I feel that any complaints about this article are alleged because Darksun is looking at the fact that the website is not notable. I admit that the site itself is not notable. However the act of cybersquatting obviously is. NickIre
- A brief mention in a (admittadly notable) blog doesn't make the incident notable. Major coverage in multiple reliable sources might, but I see no evidence of this. Darksun 17:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yet one more episode in the attack on Wikipedia by multiply-banned Nick Irelan, now trying a new sock and a new tactic to push his POV. See the earlier w:Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Nirelan. The incident is not notable, the gossip blogs Valleywag and Eye on Winer are not an encyclopedia-quality sources. betsythedevine 17:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Greswik 17:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:COI vio, WP:NPOV vio, WP:WEB vio. Nothing but a attempt by Nick Irelan to push his point. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 20:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per User:Darksun as a POV fork of the Dave Winer article. No evidence of notability for this incident. EdJohnston 21:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.