Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon Gamefarm
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nickelodeon Gamefarm[edit]
- Nickelodeon Gamefarm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. I reiterate my prod reason for this nom: None of the sources that I could find here or here establishes any notability for this show - only trivial and passing mentions. MuZemike 08:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 08:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This clearly lacks any form of third-party reliable sources and therefore notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Currently the article has no sources and a quick Google brings up nearly nothing. The second link for me is actually this WP article! Does not meet the WP:N criteria imo and as already stated, no reliable sources -- Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign!) 20:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Nickelodeon Games and Sports for Kids as an incredibly unremarkable show which aired on that network during a short-lived attempt at original programming. The show existed, but there is no information online to be found on it; most of the segments on the program were either game company PR or imported from overseas game programming. Nate • (chatter) 03:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It does have an IMDB page (also devoid of info). [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagetto (talk • contribs) 19:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails inclusion criteria as per WP:NOTE. No reliable sources.--Sloane (talk) 04:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.