Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Scoullar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Anti-Gravity Room. MBisanz ^talk 02:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Scoullar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No solid evidence of notability. Someone of this sort isn't going to get significant dead-tree coverage without significant online coverage, and the online coverage is spotty: virtually everything is Facebook and other usergenerated and/or autogenerated pages, and the few exceptions are either passing (i.e. insignificant) mentions in seemingly reliable publications (example) or soft-news and "latest news on your favorite celebrities!"-type stuff, e.g. a People story and a teenage cable guy thing in a local newspaper. There's nothing of significant coverage in solid sources. I would have deleted this as a {{db-bio}}, but I'm not fond of using such criteria on articles that have been around for nearly ten years. Nyttend (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Anti-Gravity Room. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.