Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Nunziata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Rob e rt 04:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Nunziata[edit]

Looks very much like vanity to me. Doesn't seem to be notable yet - all very much a case of how promising things look for the future, rather than how notable he is now. Delete CLW 15:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. per nom--Esprit15d 16:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I removed the speedy tag since I'm tying it now to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Creature Corner. howch e ng {chat} 22:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Eusebeus 22:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but it doesn't seem to be vanity. Judging from the last three paragraphs, someone is having a go at this bloke. Blnguyen 00:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Seems notable enough. I'd suggest merging with Chud.com, but I see that's already been deleted. Atlanta Journal Constitution: "Nick Nunziata, 32, who has built his geek-central chud.com ..." The New York Post: "... 32-year-old Web editor Nick Nunziata, who grew up obsessed with Lucas's first trilogy of "Star Wars" movies, and now edits the movie-insider site chud.com." Variety: "Chud.com creator Nick Nunziata ..." etc. -- Dragonfiend 01:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable biography. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-10 04:04Z
Speedy delete per CSD A7. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 10:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.