Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Nanton (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Nanton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional/branding "profile" for a professional promoter of "branding" services; I strongly suspect undisclosed COI editing. Orange Mike | Talk 18:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Page should be trimmed down for some WP:PROMO but looks like the page meets WP:N overall. Snavehunter (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - technically passes my standards for lawyers and his multiple Emmy wins, even if local or minor, make him a notable producer. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Snavehunter and Bearian. Article is notable enough to be kept. _SUPER ^ASTIG 05:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.