Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Doig
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nick Doig[edit]
- Nick Doig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A rugby league player, who by the article's own admission, has never played first grade football despite being on the books of a first grade club. He therefore fails WP:ATH as the National Rugby League first grade is the only fully professional league in Australia. His current club, the Newtown Jets are not a NRL club. Mkativerata (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mkativerata (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Mkativerata (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The only significant coverage I can find for this athlete is this article in the Inverell Times, which doesn't seem sufficient. Otherwise plenty of game reports and passing mentions but no significant coverage. - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Falls short of WP:GNG, fails WP:ATHLETE and the above source does not assert 'significant' coverage. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 05:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.