Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Catalano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The merits of the sources found by Cunard have not been discussed, which means that there isn't (yet) an informed consensus to delete. Sandstein 10:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Catalano[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable professor/writer. Article created by User:NickCatal. / edg ☺ ☭ 19:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find book reviews (short ones) for his book on Clifford Brown (although not very flattering ones), but nothing else of substance. I added a NYT book review to the site, since I had it "in hand." Otherwise, I don't see any signs of notability. LaMona (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

* Wikipedia:WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 11:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per LaMona. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 21:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the significant coverage here^WebCite and here, and the book reviews here, here and here. Cunard (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.