Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nichole de Carle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs) per G11. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 12:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nichole de Carle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Almost pure promotional/advertising page. Quis separabit? 00:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a promotional puffy fluffy. NICHOLE DE CARLE (A DESIGNER, A BRAND, A PRODUCT) Nichole de Carle, a British first class honours graduate in contour fashion from De Montfort University in Leicester, is an acclaimed fashion designer; primarily of luxury lingerie. Following her graduation in 2005, Nichole de Carle went on to work with Alexander McQueen, Donna Karan, and Pleasure State. In 2008, she established her own brand, which has achieved high-end success... Nichole de Carle has a strong culture heritage being a Huguenot descendant. Her designs have a sound influence from literature, art and architecture. The lingerie is innovative, inspirational and stylish.... I can use a designer barf bag at this point. Wikipedia is not an adjunct to designer undie vending. Carrite (talk) 02:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is all promotional and while I did find a few things on the internet, I haven't found anything that would justify this article existing on wikipedia. So far it's all non-notable puff pieces via blogs and the miscellaneous news entry There are a great many people who could boast just as much as she does and do not warrant an article here. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Delete per WP:ADVERT. Clearly a vanity page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: very promotional. Fails WP:GNG. 11coolguy12 (talk) 06:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - obvious promotional content. References found are not adequate to justify its existence. hmssolent\Let's convene 08:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and tagged with {{db-multiple}} accordingly. Yunshui (talk) 08:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.