Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Spaeth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SNOW. Editor has been blocked for disruptive editing over AfD nominations. (non-admin closure) Mkdwtalk 18:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nicholas Spaeth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable person, fails WP:GNG, poorly sourced article. IronKnuckle (talk) 12:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Senra (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, bordering on speedy keep. He was North Dakota Attorney General, a statewide elected office, for seven years, and therefore clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. The article already has sources, and even the quickest look at the GBooks, GNews, and GScholar results shows that there are many, many sources about him. His notability is not in question and there is no other reason to delete, rather than expand, this article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, meets WP:POLITICIAN as the former North Dakota Attorney General. EricSerge (talk) 16:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.