Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Moroder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. The Land 11:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Google at 30 hits -Dr Haggis - Talk 01:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 02:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 03:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedyDelete per nom. -- Jjjsixsix (talk)/(contribs) @ 04:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Honestly, are people just using "speedy" to add emphasis? Is "speedy" the new "literally"? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe, but not this time. I voted speedy since it's a non-notable bio. I would have slapped a {{db-bio}} on it; the guy isn't notable at all if you get out of the scope of auto mechanics. -- Jjjsixsix (talk)/(contribs) @ 04:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There's an assertion of notability there. It's up to AfD to decide if it's good enough to make the article worth keeping. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 04:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, but I've put on speedy articles with similar notability assertions (winning contests no one outside of their field or local area has heard of) and had them speedily deleted, meaning that someone with a delete button either a) agreed with me or b) has a quick finger on the delete button. In any case, I'll keep your comments in mind while weeding out new pages. -- Jjjsixsix (talk)/(contribs) @ 05:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There's an assertion of notability there. It's up to AfD to decide if it's good enough to make the article worth keeping. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 04:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe, but not this time. I voted speedy since it's a non-notable bio. I would have slapped a {{db-bio}} on it; the guy isn't notable at all if you get out of the scope of auto mechanics. -- Jjjsixsix (talk)/(contribs) @ 04:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Honestly, are people just using "speedy" to add emphasis? Is "speedy" the new "literally"? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obviously a talented auto mechanic, but that doesn't mean he qualifies for an article under WP:BIO. Capitalistroadster 04:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable bio. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 06:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:BIO refers - non-notable biography. (aeropagitica) 06:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 20:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.