Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas J. Greanias
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nicholas J. Greanias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the standards of WP:NPOL or WP:NPROF. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - fails the professor test because he's only been an adjunct, and as a diplomat because he's never been named and confirmed as an ambassador. I thank him for his service, but he's just a mid-level career officer. Bearian (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete adjunct professors are almost never notable for being such, and no other real claims to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.