Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas A. Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas A. Jones

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODding editor self-reverted after the edit was recognized as an accidental violation of their TBan, but busy as this person may be, I currently don't see this getting past any notability thresholds. Offered sources are either WP:PRIMARY or strictly local, but nothing to meet WP:GNG to a sufficient degree. AngryHarpy‍^talk 08:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AngryHarpy‍^talk 08:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AngryHarpy‍^talk 08:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. AngryHarpy‍^talk 08:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neither restaurateurs nor unsuccessful election candidates are entitled to automatic notability freebies just because they exist, but the sourcing here isn't solid enough to suggest that he clears the actual notability criteria for those occupations. Three of the five footnotes are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and of the just two that are media, both are local coverage in local-interest contexts that don't clinch notability all by themselves if they're all he can show. Bearcat (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient sourcing to meet the GNG from a preliminary search, fails NPOL, reeks of PROMO. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet notability. How are the fries? Miaminsurance (talk) 20:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails both GNG and NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.