Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nic nolan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 09:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nic nolan[edit]

Vanity article with no independent sources to establish that this Program Director is in any way notable. Cap'n Walker 15:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 20:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails to establish sufficient notability and a resume to boot. No news articles about Nick (he's mentioned as getting married, and as being at a party in articles about others), no books, no articles and nothing that meets the biographical notability requirements. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced autobiography. He just might be notable enough for an article if sources could be found, but this one is better deleted.-gadfium 03:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Fails WP:BIO. Doubtful that non-trivial, independent sources exist. Doctorfluffy 06:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there were reliable sources in existence out there, I'd be in favour of leaving the article alone, but this... I think it would be better off to delete it. ~ Sebi 04:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.