Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niagara Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Niagara Networks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Niagara Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability . Notices only, except fpr tthe Forbes item which is by an outside contributor, who just happens to be the vice president of the firm/. DGG ( talk ) 02:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 04:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 04:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Lacks the significant independent coverage in multiple reliable sources to establish inclusion in Wikipedia is warranted. The sourcing in the article does not establish notability. As of this version, the article has 5 sources:
  1. An eWeek article which mentions the company but provides no depth of coverage
  2. Purports to be a product review but the author literally cut and pasted this press release
  3. The Forbes article is from a VP of the firm, so it not independent
  4. The Helpnetsecurity article is from the same VP as the Forbes article, again not independent
  5. This is a press release from the company

My own search just turns up more press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 13:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Good analysis by Whqp above, there doesn't appear to be any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.