Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nglish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nglish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Posibly a promotional article created by a single purpose account. It was previously deleted under WP:G13 and recreated by its creator Matangor who was asked by Jimfbleak to stop creating articles from the company and to disclose if he had any conflict of interest. The article does not meet WP:WEB or WP:NSOFT as it is also an app. It also does not have the needed independent in-depth coverage from reliable sources to meet our general notability guidelines. Searching in internet I could find two reviews for the app. One disclosed that it was sponsored (not independent), and I suspect that the other one I found (in Spanish) probably is as well. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was given pause in this due to the app having won an Appy Award from MediaPost. However, that award is of questionable value; it's generated by an organization that seems focused on awards as a direct money-making base (as suggested by their varying price structure with discounts and deals), and given the lack of notability suggested by there being no Wikipedia page for it (the page Appy Awards is for a different award of the same name... and not even the only different award by that name.) Note: I was the person that deleted the PROD, but that was for technical reasons. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches simply found no better convincing sources. SwisterTwister talk 23:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.