Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neya (inhabited locality)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neya (inhabited locality)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one place with an article. The other isn't even mentioned in its linked article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, this is not a dab, this is a set index article. Set index articles can even consist fully of red links.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The dab Neya which links the town would be allowed to also link the red rural locality. Reywas92^Talk 19:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- No it won't. Red links must satisfy WP:DABRL to be included on disambiguaton pages. For set indices, a reference is sufficient (but including a reference on a disambiguation page is also contrary to disambiguation page formatting guidelines; hence a set index).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 6, 2020; 21:22 (UTC)
Keep per Yaroslav, and as a page creator.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 6, 2020; 21:22 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No corresponding article/index in Russian. Trivial info. Kolma8 (talk) 13:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per Ymblanter. Just because there's no Russian article doesn't mean we don't want one. Having the set index is helpful for people working in the area of Russian localities as it helps keep track of what has an article and what doesn't yet. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.