Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Time Ned

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 01:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Next Time Ned

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 01:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have cleaned up and sourced the article now. But I am not sure if the film has been released. The IMDB page for the film has been deleted and the entry removed from the producer/lead's IMDB page (google cache says it was there previously with status listed as post production). The producer's webpage says "it is coming soon" and the official webpage is a deadlink. I don't know if this is enough to satisfy WP:NFF (uncertain release status etc). But i am voting keep per WP:GNG as the production has received coverage in Evening Times, the trade journal of the Scotland's National film body and the 2008 UK film guide of Edinburgh International Film Festival.--Sodabottle (talk) 18:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per meeting GNG. Even if not released, notability of a topic in Scotland is notable enough for en.Wikipedia. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.