Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Bracknell parliamentary election

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bracknell (UK Parliament constituency). (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next Bracknell parliamentary election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No other constituency has a page for the next election (or any previous election). All the contents of the page could easily be transferred to Bracknell (UK Parliament constituency). Philip Stevens (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Bracknell (UK Parliament constituency) rather than delete, in order to preserve article history and comply with the GFDL. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, I agree, a lot of the contents of the page should be merged into the constituency page. --Philip Stevens (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge to Bracknell (UK Parliament constituency). I'm not sure we need to go into this much detail for standard elections in parliamentary constituencies, but that's a content issue to discuss. Having been to Bracknell myself, can't say I'll be fighting anyone for that seat. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Eastmain. I've never been to Bracknell, but I went through on a minibus twice a day for about a week 10 or so years ago when I was temping at Royal Ascot. It didn't inspire me to visit further, so it wouldn't be in my top 10 most desirable constituencies to represent. Thryduulf (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back to Bracknell (UK Parliament constituency). We deal with future elections in an election box. Any commentary on its significnace is likely to be WP:OR. WE do not need 649 of this kind of article (one per constituency) but that would be the logical conclusion of keeping it. Furthermore, the article (or rather most of the 649) would probably need deletion when the election is over. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.