Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NexG PrePaid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of Notability, information irrelevant to product and seems like advertising a product Cahk (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 23:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete' N/N product per wp:product. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed my mind: Keep This is beginning to look like a product something similar to Octopus card, not as large, but getting there. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - does not seem especially notable as a credit card. - mattbuck 23:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this looks promising http://www.marketresearch.com/map/prod/1354577.html and so does this http://www.mcm-tech.com/mcm_technologies/default.asp?id=39 . I'm sure there is more. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand why people believe this product is notable, however, I am more concerned with the fact that nothing in this article relates to the product described (except the fact it's a Malaysian product)--Cahk (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep or redirect to AmBank. "There are more than 100,000 NexG Prepaid Card in circulation. since its launch in the third quarter of 2006." [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Here (talk • contribs) 04:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.