Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/News Vanguard (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus the article is ineligible for soft deletion and a merge (or even a WP:BLAR) can be discussed on the article's talk page Salvio giuliano 15:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

News Vanguard[edit]

News Vanguard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did not find any primary sources or secondary sources conforming to this article directly in particular. Khorang 06:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (he/her) (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: the last relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete/Merge - The article is one sentence and the website is unavailable. Virtually no reader value as is for over 5 years of existence. Already mentioned on Tripura and Sudip Datta Bhaumik. Web archive for reference.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.