Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsCred

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NewsCred[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed a majority of the worst contents but the remaining still make this questionable for solid notability. My searches at News have particularly found massive numbers of sources, but several are simply PR, blogs, news about its funding, "Companies to Watch in the Future" and such all suggesting this is still getting news mainly for its funding and is not yet notable. See particularly this and also the differences between versions here and here. Notifying DGG as he has a history of examining these articles especially when it comes to expected news for funding. SwisterTwister talk 20:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Little but public relations dross. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. promotional . TheNYTimes article might hilp support an article on the ceo, but not on the company. `

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.