Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsBank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as this, like Highbeam, is considered notable and acceptable so the consensus will much likely be keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NewsBank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A prior version of this article was deleted after a WP:PROD. I haven't seen the prior version of the article, so naturally the version I created, from scratch, uses completely different material. So far the article I've created incorporates cited material from sixteen (16) WP:RS sources. I've demonstrated both a History of the company from approximately 1973 to 2014, as well as a bit about Reception of the company -- primarily as given in comments from authors of books about reference works and library guides. As there was the prior deletion after the WP:PROD, bringing here to AFD to assess from the community whether we should bother to continue to perform quality improvement efforts on this article. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 04:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cirt has done an excellent job rebuilding an article about this notable topic. Thanks. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable now, but then it was pretty obvious it was a notable topic before IMHO, though the prior article was poorly sourced. I could scarcely believe it when I saw this page had been deleted. I don't have time to monitor my Watchlist as closely as I once did (and certainly don't have time to recreate the page, so my thanks to Cirt) — maybe a case for PRODs and other deletion notices to be highlighted in some way on the Watchlist? Or even an option 'email me if a page on my Watchlist is up for deletion?' Qwfp (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A bit of a no-brainer. Clearly a notable topic, and clearly a well-written and well-referenced article. GrindtXX (talk) 10:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to have sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The sources in the article amply show that the organization is significant and notable per WP:ORG. NewsBank provides a national-level news database used by libraries and news organizations. I had removed the notability tag a few days before the PROD, and it was lost in my watchlist for me as well. An improved watchlist function is definitely an idea worth exploring. Mz7 (talk) 22:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.