Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Buses & Ferries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newcastle Buses & Ferries[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As the 1,900 bus Sydney Buses article has been incorporated into the State Transit Authority article, propose this article on the smaller 200 bus fleet also be set as a Redirect per branch policy. Mo7838 (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.Mo7838 (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Mo7838 (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kraxler (talk) 15:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if the intention is simply to redirect. There is content in the article that should not be lost. While part of the State Transit Authority, there is enough content to support a separate article. Note that WP:BRANCH is part of a section on "Non-commercial organizations" and this is a commercial organisation, so WP:BRANCH doesn't actually apply. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.