Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand School of Export

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand School of Export[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tiny non-notable online-only school fails WP:GNG. I'm not even sure if it is properly classified as a school, it sounds more like a training program. I can find no WP:RS about the organization. The only two non-affiliated secondary sources I could find were trivial mentions where its founder was quoted discussing other matters. Most of the sources cited in the article are either non-independent or primary-source documents like government registrations. Also appears to be a violation of WP:PROMOTION: the article's creator appears to be affiliated with the school and has created several other self-promotion articles that are currently in AfD (1, 2, 3). This article also has an advertisement-like style and has content promoting non-notable theories and inventions of its founder. GretLomborg (talk) 06:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RUCS, also by the same author, AfD ended as Delete.

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prealism, also by the same author, AfD ended as Delete.

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets of the Artists, also by the same author, AfD ended as Delete. - GretLomborg (talk) 17:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nom. Promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 17:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, Rudzki's userpage has also just been deleted as self-promotion, so this is really the last of it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam, with copy such as "...a leading provider of professional education for exporters within the country..." etc. Just corporate spam / WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing notable about. Fails WP:GNG NealeFamily (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.