Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Renaissance Faire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 13:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
New York Renaissance Faire[edit]
Delete. Non-notable event. Association with Jon Lovitz and David Brimmer (who?) is not verified by anything I can find. ... discospinster talk 23:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep & Clean Up Added sources: In process of confirming Lovitz reference. -Rensource — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.117.125 (talk • contribs)
- Keep & Expand I just started the article so that those with a greater knowledge of the rich history of the NYRF might expand on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grepowell (talk • contribs)
Relisted for clearer consensus Computerjoe's talk 19:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since the day after this AfD nomination, not even the article creator has returned to edit this article - so much for expansion. No independent coverage of this event as far as I can tell. Kimchi.sg 20:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Keep, expand per TruthbringerToronto - D'oh! I was so sleepy I missed the sources section. Apologies. *reminds self never again to comment in AfDs at 4 in the morning* Kimchi.sg 14:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep' Kimchi.sg, I am confused by what you mean by "independent coverage". Did you see the list of sources? Grepowell
Delete I must've missed Kimchi.sg's comments somehow.Keep & Clean Up per TruthbringerToronto --Starionwolf 20:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. If the New York Times writes about this event, then it's notable. See the list of references. TruthbringerToronto 00:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep is notable, and deserves to stay. Trm3 11:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.