Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Stage (Jesse McCartney album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Jesse McCartney discography. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Stage (Jesse McCartney album)[edit]

New Stage (Jesse McCartney album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. This was previously redirected and has recently been recreated, but I am still struggling to find evidence of notability here. There are some reliable sources, but the problem is that they are interviews and therefore fail WP:PRIMARY – all the quotes and descriptions of the album are from McCartney himself, and the only real independent information you can get from them is "his new album which is coming soon after a seven-year break has 11 songs about his fiancee, and it was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic". Which doesn't really need an entire article to say, and doesn't provide any notability for the album, it's just a description. To be completely fair here, I found another RS which is not used in the article [1]... but again, it's another interview with almost nothing noteworthy to be extracted from it. The Entertainment Tonight interview is from two years before the album and doesn't mention it at all, and Euphoria doesn't look like an RS to me – no evidence of an editorial team, and it appears to be an "anyone can contribute" website like Medium. No reviews, no chart positions, and nothing about the album at all after its release, apart from tour dates... all we have are these promotional interviews. Richard3120 (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jesse McCartney: Found no evidence of notability myself. Surprisingly, this was accepted from a draft. Somehow landed the one reviewer who would approve this, I guess. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This album has been out for three years, so it's not likely that any more reviews will be located in the next few months. Richard3120 (talk) 22:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Jesse McCartney discography as there does not appear to significant coverage of the album in reliable, secondary sources. I think that discography list would be a better redirect target than the article. Aoba47 (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.