Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Paltz Zombieology Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 09:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Paltz Zombieology Center[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD-contested by article creator. Trivial subject from one episode of a TV show fails WP:GNG. See also WP:INDISCRIMINATE. elektrik SHOOS (talk) 09:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The rapid spread of references to the New Paltz Zombieology Center is an interesting cultural phenomenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdgaines (talk • contribs) 09:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CARES The topic is of interest to more than zero people.

WP:CHANCE Give the topic a chance to take off.

WP:DEMOLISH Don't burn the house down before it's built. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdgaines (talk • contribs) 09:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The first link you pointed to is marked as humorous and shouldn't be taken seriously. The second and third are essays, which are the opinions of individual Wikipedia editors and are not policy. elektrik SHOOS (talk) 22:15, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Everything ever brought to AfD is of interest to more than zero people (otherwise it wouldn't have inspired someone to write the piece), has a theoretical chance to "take off," and is, by definition, not fully built. What this process is about is determining whether an article topic is encyclopedia worthy (or at least entertainingly pop culturally crufty) and the subject of substantial coverage in multiple, independently produced, published sources. This, alas, is not. Carrite (talk) 22:13, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Trivia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:40, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No sources on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 02:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to SUNY New Paltz. Bearian (talk) 15:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.