Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Oldspeak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per G3. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Oldspeak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant hoax.Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. No verifiable information, no songs available, no fanbase, nothing. Information that can be verified is false. —- Sirfurboy (talk) 09:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HOAX. MarnetteD|Talk 09:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete part of a series of articles relating to the same band that appear to all be an (elaborate) hoax. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.