Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Left 95

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎ . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Left 95[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From brief WP:BEFORE Googling in both English and Lithuanian, I could find only these two sources with passing mentions and that's it. –Vipz (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Lithuania. –Vipz (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No establishment of notability, fails GNG. Written in POV promotional language. The only link is to an archived versional of their official website, which is no longer active. Could have probably been WP:PROD'd. — Czello ^(music) 15:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.