Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New L.Zoyang(Mate-Taithul) village

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New L.Zoyang(Mate-Taithul) village[edit]

New L.Zoyang(Mate-Taithul) village (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for PROD as it was de-PROD'd in 2012 under the rationale "all villages are notable". Generally true, under WP:GEOLAND, but here's the rub - this place utterly fails WP:V. It isn't on the Indian Census of 2011 no matter how you search, nor on GEOnet, or even Google Maps. On a search, I found nothing but Wikipedia mirrors. The single "source" is unfindable, nigh-meaningless - "village authority"? Is that an official legal document or something some guy wrote down in his living room one day - if it's even a real document and not a hoax. No way to know, but given the complete lack of sourcing, we can't keep this around. ♠PMC(talk) 19:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 19:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not enough sources have been provided to establish that this is a legally recognized place. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Census of India maintains a fairly comprehensive record of all the places in the country. If it doesn't show up anything, then WP:GEOLAND is probably not met. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.