Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Horizons (strategy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Horizons (strategy)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable campaign. Governments come up with many such schemes/"strategies"/campaigns all the time, does not make them automatically notable. Other than the publication of the strategy in 2009 here, I cannot find much external coverage. Search results include this unrelated charity.

Overall poor-quality article on non-notable topic. Elshad (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Psychiatry, and England. Elshad (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- No indication in the article or WP:BEFORE searches of WP:GNG. No WP:PERSISTENCE or WP:DEPTH and sources are WP:PRIMARY. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.