Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hampshire's 1st congressional district election, 2006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2006. Neutralitytalk 04:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- New Hampshire's 1st congressional district election, 2006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It makes little to no sense for a separate article for this election article to exist when: a) It is in need of serious edits to fix many mistakes. b) It is redundant: All of this information, in fewer words, can be found at the page for "United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2006." This page offers nothing new to the event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tqycolumbia (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to statewide article at United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2006#First district; redundant and unnecessary. With only two districts in New Hampshire, that article can easily cover the elections that year in both districts. And the stand-alone 1st district article is merely a copy of the information already found at the statewide article. Judging from the edit histories, it looks like the 1st district article was posted later from text copied and pasted (without attribution, mind you) from statewide one, so outright deletion would also be okay, as long as all the incoming links are fixed. postdlf (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per postdlf.--JayJasper (talk) 18:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.