Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Confederacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Confederacy[edit]

There is no "New Confederacy." The creator's personal blog and website are not credible sources. "Neo-confederate" article covers this topic.--Phenz 03:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vanity, original research ect... Nigelthefish 14:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete link goes nowhere, article gives no worthwhile information --Stevefarrell 01:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons cited above. --RockyMM 17:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this group is ridiculous and the article even more so. Unencyclopedic. -Not Diablo 03:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But this is indeed a seperate group. crazyfurf

This article doesn't seem to have any point except to offer the link that is on the bottom. -Sayfadeen
Delete as vanity. *drew 14:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable, vanity. --JW1805 (Talk) 03:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity, original research. --Ter e nc e Ong 06:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No way to expand the article, and while I don't doubt the group's existence, I really don't think that it's notable enough to be encyclopedic. S t e v e o 2 11:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOR. --Strothra 17:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable group with, per nom, no verifiable information about them. —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a vanity article. Tachyon01 04:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Neo-confederate. This has very little context and doesn't seem to be a notable group. Evidence of independent coverage would be good. Grand master ka 03:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.