Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Never Among Friends

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never Among Friends

Non-notable film, vanity. Sure it's on IMDB, but as the AfD for the article's creator (see here) said, this film is a textbook example of why existance of an IMDB entry alone doesn't establish notability. I agree. The IMDB takes submissions from anyone. Even the rating there are suspect, there is a large group of people sounding suspiciously alike who just can't wait for the DVD release - and all of them have only one entry; yup, you guess it, for this movie. Seems like IMDB has sockpuppets too. Ifnord 01:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable film created by non-notable crew. Royboy crashfan 01:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; non-notable movie; an IMDb profile does not make a movie notable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Movie Base data? Royboy crashfan 01:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, accidental typo --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete what is this crap. --Rob from NY 01:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, canonical red link farm in full effect. They had more filming locations than screening locations? Yikes. --Deville (Talk) 02:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. A budget of $7,000, and every single person involved is a red link. Oh, and the movie's website is begging for a distributor. That's a nice touch. Is every student filmmaker in the world trying to promote themselves through WP? Fan1967 03:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the website also begs people to go to IMDB and vote for the movie, which presumably explains the glowing ratings. Fan1967 03:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the basis that the list of screenings indicates it is not on general release, plus concerns above. Just zis Guy you know? 10:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn film. Advertising??? --Ter e nc e Ong 13:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my original PROD: "Vanity page for film produced by creator of article. Some IMDb information, some Google hits, but nothing indicating widespread distribution, i.e., screened at one or two non-notable film festivals and no video availability. Your typical non-WP:ENC, dime-a-dozen indie film." --Kinu ^t/_c 05:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I live in South Jersey, an admitted film buff, less than 15 miles from some of the screenings, and I've never heard of this film. MusicMaker5376 21:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.