Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurophysiology of Movement Lab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neurophysiology of Movement Lab[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A small laboratory within a single department at a university. The article does not give its web page, but it is [1]. What it seems to be, judging also from the department web site [2], is the laboratory of a single professor, Roger M. Enoka--who is notable, but hardly the suite he works in. (the article on him is a copyvio from http://physed.otago.ac.nz/alumni/wof/inductees/2010RogerMaroEnoka.html, and I have so marked it). The department as a whole is unlikely to be notable, and certainly not the subdivisions of it. There's nothing worth even redirecting. The author is an SPA, whose other contributions are an article on another member of the department which I have not yet checked for copyvio, and an article on the just possibly notable building it is located in, Carlson Gymnasium--but the contents of that article seems to be mainly a directory of the occupants of the building. DGG ( talk ) 07:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:N. Even individual university departments are generally not sufficiently notable to have separate article about them, and this one is a small lab within a department. Nsk92 (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no independent coverage. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 11:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.