Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netypsy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DS (talk) 06:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Netypsy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, unreferenced, zero coverage online. Prod contested by WP:SPA. MuffledThud (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious delete, it's a WP:MADEUP WP:NEOLOGISM. Zero GHits other than this article. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteOnly exists on Wikipedia, an attmept to invent a term.Slatersteven (talk) 21:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, also, the source given doesn't seem easy to verfy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RadManCF (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The source given? I'd usually expect "weird internet lingo" to appear, well, anywhere on the internet! Glenfarclas (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:V. Deor (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. "Shyam Ratauri Das" the supposed author of the reference has no hits on google either. Seems to be WP:MADEUP. Joshua Scott (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.