Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Q RAC Rally (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination basically withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Izno (talk) 14:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Network Q RAC Rally (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on the popular sport of Wales Rally GB, but that notability is not transferable to video game which fails WP:GNG Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Plenty of reviews listed at Mobygames in contemporaneous magazines. It's contingent on how many of these magazines can actually be found to prove the coverage is significant, but I would err on the side of not deleting, per WP:DOUBT._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, per Zxcvbnm, keeping the article allows time for old magazine articles to be dug up from old internet archives to be cited and paraphrased into either a new section of the article or as external links, but I would agree that substantial information needs to be present. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- You can't vote "weak keep" on your own AfD, that makes no sense. AfD is by definition for when you feel beyond a shadow of a doubt that an article should be deleted. In the future, please use PROD for these types of non controversial articles._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.