Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netstep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Netstep[edit]

Netstep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software program, fails WP:GNG, could not find sources for most of the sources are about other non-notable companies with similar names. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 20:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- published in 2010, not notable (by reference) then. The product was discontinued the same year. No lasting power, not notable. Rhadow (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A WP:SPA article on a subsequently abandoned Firefox fork. I am seeing nothing to indicate that it attained encyclopaedic notability, by WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.