Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netop Summer Camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. not further sources have emerged and the delete votes therefore prevail. Since this is clearly marginal I'll note here that recreation is expressly permitted if someone can find anything more Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Netop Summer Camp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I was able to find a couple of articles covering "Camp Netop", nothing rises to significant coverage in reliable sources. ^Bongo_matic 01:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. — Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 11:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just put in some references. Please check it out and reconsider deleting this page. Peetlesnumber1 (talk) 20:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Nice try on the references, but none of them qualifies as an independent reliable source as Wikipedia requires. I tried searching Google News Archive to see if the camp has gotten any news coverage, but all I could find was a couple of directory-type listings. Unfortunately, if the camp is not WP:NOTABLE as Wikipedia defines it, no amount of rewriting or addition is going to save the article. Sorry. --MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to Weak delete. Searching without the word "summer" in the search turned up this full article from the Times-Herald, and this two-paragraph mention in the Christian Science Monitor. Those are getting closer to what we need here. --MelanieN (talk) 22:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 14:34, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.