Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nethicite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nethicite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. Ged UK (talk) 08:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails everything! Fails WP:N, WP:RS, etc. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blimey - an epic fail of every policy going. --Killerofcruft (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete- clearly WP:CSD A7- does not show the importance of the subject. Sticky Parkin 15:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - I don't even see how this makes a claim of notability. TN‑X-Man 18:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - [Insert various policy citations as you see fit here] -Rushyo (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and close per WP:SNOW. But do not speedy delete delete it; it does not meet the relevant criteria. To the above speedies: A7 is strictly for real people/clubs/bands/companies and organisations. WP:N and WP:RS are not speedy criteria. Nevertheless, it's pointless to keep this open much longer, because it clearly fails all policies. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.