Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetBase Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NetBase Solutions[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be some WP:REFBOMBing. The highest quality references here (e.g. Economist, Wall Street Journal) contain only the most incidental of mentions, others (e.g. San Jose Mercury News) have WP:ROUTINE coverage of hirings and promotions. All outlets which do contain more substantial mentions are those sources we have, typically, not considered creditable for purposes of establishing WP:N (e.g. business journals, Bloomberg company directory profiles etc.). Some sources are repeated multiple times under different names but are, in fact, the same source (e.g. " "Elsevier and NetBase Launch illumin8" credited both to something called Information Today and to something else called Newsbreak). A standard BEFORE finds a few dozens additional references, all of which are more incidental mentions, inclusion in analyst reports, or press releases. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article looks like it was part of the same PR campaign as some of the references, such as [1]. There's virtually nothing on recent activity. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 00:51, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.