Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net2Phone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 02:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Net2Phone[edit]

No references to notability. Sure, they sued Skype but that hardly a major claim of notability (note, THAT info is actually missing in the article...) -- ErnestVoice ^{(User) (Talk)} 19:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. Net2Phone was an early and leading player in VoIP in the early 2000s. Continuous RS coverage going back to 1999 is easily found with a Google News search. • Gene93k (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one of the major companies at the time, and notability is not lost. DGG (talk)
Keep. It definately needs expanding, but the company itself is notable as an early player. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a quick perusal of Google New results show a plethora of articles about the company over a significant period of time. There is no doubt the article needs improvement but the amount of coverage indicates notability is easily met. -- Whpq (talk) 16:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.