Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nermin Zolotić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 13:55, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nermin Zolotić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. He's a man on the move. He finally went pro for 20 minutes in a Europa League game in Tel Aviv earlier this month.[1] Kauffner (talk) 08:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. If Željezničar is considered a fully-professional team, then he passes WP:FOOTYN. But since the Bosnian league is not fully-professional, i am not sure if Željezničar is either. Kosm1fent ^{Won't you talk to me?} 10:17, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 15:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As the Bosnian top flight is not a fully professional league, this player does not meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG criteria. Deserter1 talk 11:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.