Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neptune class survey ship
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neptune class survey ship[edit]
Was de-prodded about a week or so ago with the assurance that "it is cannon" [sic] mentioned in the article (never a good sign). I tagged with {{clean up}} and more importantly {{Unreferenced}}. While in the most excruciatingly painful sense it is technically canon (see here), the vast majority of this article is pure original research. One line in a TV show and a fan site entry do not combine for notable encyclopedia articles. Irongargoyle 22:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Really random comment When I typed the word "excruciatingly" into Google to make sure I'd spelled it correctly while writing the initial nomination, my first result was a page entitled "Eric's Excruciatingly Detailed Star Trek (TOS) Plot Summaries." I thought that was quite ironic and a little amusing. Irongargoyle 22:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. William Pietri 22:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete original research. `'mikka (t) 22:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. My Alt Account 22:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Hello32020 00:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect somewhere into the Star Trek articles. :) Dlohcierekim
- Delete. Memory Alpha material. Gazpacho 05:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ergative rlt 22:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I looked at the starfleet ship entry on wiki it did not contain this ship. it did not contain the intrepid type either. i found it no more noteable than any other sci fi ship artical. dregj —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.123.177 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 16 September 2006
- Delete per nom. AlistairMcMillan 22:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.