Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neorutter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neorutter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by IP with deceptive edit summary. Unreferenced neologism. Google brings up no results for "Neorutter" as a musical term. XXX antiuser ^eh? 16:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Neorutter[reply]

Delete. I can find no coverage for this term. Per WP:NEO: "To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept." No such sources found. Gongshow ^Talk 16:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. Guess it was a Twinkle hiccup. XXX antiuser ^eh? 19:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:NEO, looks like WP:OR. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.