Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neon Starlight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neon Starlight[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

game that may have been created by the author...anyway there's no indication of importance and no sources other than the game's site Go Phightins! (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this game was created by the author. Apologies I am new and have just read the COI information and suspect I am conflicted. I can provide links to references if that will help prevent deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamlatchem (talk • contribs) 20:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that'd be a start, but I think a major issue is notability. See WP:GNG...Go Phightins! (talk) 20:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSOFT would also apply here too. --Drm310 (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unfortunately. I added links to two of the sites that have reviews for the game, but it doesn't look like either qualifies as a reliable source, based on their about pages: [1] [2]. Can't find any other significant coverage. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 03:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It appears that the game has received little coverage and therefore is non-notable. While searching with Google News UK (after finishing my unsuccessful Google US search), I found this which claims that morningDewApps.com reviewed them but I can't find an exact link to confirm this but rather, I have found mirror links (blogs, iTunes, etc.). Considering that the game was only released nearly two months ago, it may be too soon. SwisterTwister talk 22:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.