Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neoism (political ideology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neoism (political ideology)

Cannot quite call this original research because it references a website. But I suspect that the website was created by the author of this article. Non-notable new theory. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect – any significant points to Neoism It will fit well there. ShoesssS ^Talk 12:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dissagree with redirect... The name implies a disambiguation page. Fails WP:N
Delete unless independant references indicating notability can be found. Edward321 (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable for lack of independent sources. Don't redirect to Neoism which is something quite different. JohnCD (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though perhaps not quite mainstream or entirely verifiable information, maybe this article (and its author) should be given a chance at elaboration and further explanations... Besides, what is being advocated does not sound so unfavorable or absurd anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paxari (talk • contribs) 19:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC) — Paxari (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

First of all, I merely contributed to the creation of the website and Neoism is NOT a theory it is an IDEOLOGY. Second of all, one of Wikipedia’s so-called editors misspelled Independent as “inpedpendant “, if this is the intellectual caliber of the individuals judging my article then I have certainly lost a lot of respect for Wikipedia.

Delete. No reliable sources present in the article, and I can't find any myself. (To limit false positives, I searched for neo +supravea +vajulad +jaleex +altika +"tyco-dai" +isis; these are apparently the seven basic principles of Neoism.) AnturiaethwrTalk 20:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 20:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.