Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neodog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete - non admin close. ukexpat (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neodog[edit]

Delete - Fails WP:OR and WP:V. No sources. Possible hoax. Ward3001 (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Ward3001 (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obvious hoax. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't call hoax, I call neologism - and at that, if it originated in a comic book, it isn't widespread. Maybe Urbane Dictionary will like this one? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obvious neologism, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HOAX. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, complete hoax; no hits on google. Y5nthon5a (talk) 04:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete So nominated per G1 ukexpat (talk) 14:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.