Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neocatechumens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Neocatechumenal Way. Tone 21:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neocatechumens

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, duplicates Neocatechumenal Way, being used as an attack page Elizium23 (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Elizium23 (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Elizium23 (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elizium23 do you think this could be changed to a redirect to the primary page of the Neocatechumenal Way? Ncwfl (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is the best outcome, and I thought of it as soon as I hit the button on this AFD, but considering the edit-warring going on at the moment around this topic, it probably would not have lasted long if I'd just unilaterally done it. Elizium23 (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to tell what the best solution for that will be, but considering that there are no references on that page anyway I don't see why it should exist. If anything it can be added somewhere on the main page as a section if references are found. Ncwfl (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were several references in the material I deleted. They were WP:PRIMARY links to the NCW's statutes, so they did not do a lot for the remnant of the article. Elizium23 (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the deletion, since the simple belonging to a school does not confer any specific character to its members.Advocateoftherota (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Redirect to Neocatechumenal Way, whose content for now it would just duplicate. Jahaza (talk) 20:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as stated above; the Neocatechumenal Way article is well developed and would be more useful to the reader. This term should be added to Wiktionary if it isn't there already.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Neocatechumenal Way per WP:CHEAP, and a better article can be made by trimming down than by building up. Bearian (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.